<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The I-9 and E-Verify Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9</link>
	<description>News and Best Practices from Respected Experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:11:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Pre I-9 Audit Planning: Prepare for the Worst and Hope for the Best (Part 1 of 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/basics/pre-i-9-audit-planning-prepare-worst-hope-best-1/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pre-i-9-audit-planning-prepare-worst-hope-best-1</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/basics/pre-i-9-audit-planning-prepare-worst-hope-best-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Valentine Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance Measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prepare I-9 Audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worst Case Scenarios]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=2480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Editor’s Note: Our two-day blog series is courtesy of Valentine A. Brown, Partner at Duane Morris, LLP.] There are many reasons why an employer may decide to conduct a voluntary I-9 Form audit: a merger or acquisition; a non-immigration related investigation by federal or state agencies, such as DOL or IRS; mandatory or voluntary E-Verify [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/basics/pre-i-9-audit-planning-prepare-worst-hope-best-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHS FY2013 Budget Proposal – Will E-Verify Become Mandatory?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/announcements/dhs-2013-budget-proposal-e-verify-mandatory/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dhs-2013-budget-proposal-e-verify-mandatory</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/announcements/dhs-2013-budget-proposal-e-verify-mandatory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ann Cun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMAGE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FY2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FY2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FY2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=2500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like clockwork this time of year, the Department of Homeland Security released its annual budget proposal for FY2013, totaling more than $59 billion. There were few surprises in this 3,134 page budget proposal but some interesting and consistent patterns emerged.  DHS’ top five mission priorities include: Preventing Terrorism and Enhancing Security Securing and Managing Borders [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/announcements/dhs-2013-budget-proposal-e-verify-mandatory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USCIS Considers Secondary Review Process for E-Verify Final Nonconfirmations</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/uscis-considers-secondary-review-process-for-e-verify-final-nonconfirmations/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=uscis-considers-secondary-review-process-for-e-verify-final-nonconfirmations</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/uscis-considers-secondary-review-process-for-e-verify-final-nonconfirmations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Fay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USCIS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=2456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Verification Division held a stakeholder engagement to gather feedback on a formal “review process” for those employees who receive an erroneous final nonconfirmation (FNC) from the E-Verify system. The meeting consisted primarily of questions to the audience regarding our experience with the current FNC process as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/uscis-considers-secondary-review-process-for-e-verify-final-nonconfirmations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USCIS Announces Nationwide Expansion of E-Verify Self Check Program</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/uscis-announces-nationwide-expansion-of-e-verify-self-check-program/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=uscis-announces-nationwide-expansion-of-e-verify-self-check-program</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/uscis-announces-nationwide-expansion-of-e-verify-self-check-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Fay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antidiscrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USCIS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=2398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever wondered whether the US government thinks you’re authorized to work in the United States? Sure, you may have your own documentation which proves this point, but what about those big government databases filled with social security numbers, dates of birth, and other biographic information? If you had the opportunity to ask these [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/uscis-announces-nationwide-expansion-of-e-verify-self-check-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I-9 and E-Verify Readers Benefit from Well Researched Original Blog Articles</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/announcements/i-9-and-e-verify-readers-benefit-from-well-researched-original-blog-articles/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=i-9-and-e-verify-readers-benefit-from-well-researched-original-blog-articles</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/announcements/i-9-and-e-verify-readers-benefit-from-well-researched-original-blog-articles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Fay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9 compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Original]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=2374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time-consuming, confusing, challenging and overwhelming can easily describe the I-9 and E-Verify compliance arena, especially when it comes to Employers having to navigate through potential minefields of errors and/or violations.  In fact, some of my more popular articles have included coverage of record fines and penalties levied on U.S. employers by ICE or DOJ, each [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/announcements/i-9-and-e-verify-readers-benefit-from-well-researched-original-blog-articles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warning: Employers Revisited by ICE for Past I-9 Mistakes</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/enforcement/warning-employers-revisited-by-ice-for-past-i-9-mistakes/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=warning-employers-revisited-by-ice-for-past-i-9-mistakes</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/enforcement/warning-employers-revisited-by-ice-for-past-i-9-mistakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Lashus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=2357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Editor's Note: today's blog is courtesy of Kevin Lashus of Jackson Lewis LLP] The Obama Administration is launching another round of worksite investigations — this time, returning to employers that have already been the subject of I-9 inspections during the last three years.  Approximately 500 employers are being re-visited by Special Agents to confirm that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/enforcement/warning-employers-revisited-by-ice-for-past-i-9-mistakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Merger and Acquisition Process: Staying I-9 Compliant</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/compliance-measures/the-merger-and-acquisition-process-staying-i-9-compliant/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-merger-and-acquisition-process-staying-i-9-compliant</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/compliance-measures/the-merger-and-acquisition-process-staying-i-9-compliant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Fay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compliance Measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=2336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the latest report from Morningstar, the first half of 2011 was an impressive one for mergers and acquisition deals, though it slowed for the second half of 2011.  Overall deals still exceeded that of years prior.  Along the same lines, Berkery Noyes’ recent report confirms similar growth for 2011 in the education industry, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/compliance-measures/the-merger-and-acquisition-process-staying-i-9-compliant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retail’s BIG Show Reveals BIG Concerns over I-9 and E-Verify Compliance</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/retail-big-show-reveals-big-concerns-over-i-9-and-e-verify-compliance/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=retail-big-show-reveals-big-concerns-over-i-9-and-e-verify-compliance</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/retail-big-show-reveals-big-concerns-over-i-9-and-e-verify-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Fay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=2314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every year in January the National Retail Federation (“NRF”) holds its annual Convention and Expo, which is aptly named “the Big Show,” drawing more than 22,000 retail professionals from around the world. While this year’s show was focused mostly on emerging technologies and trends in the industry, many of the US-based attendees expressed growing concern [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/retail-big-show-reveals-big-concerns-over-i-9-and-e-verify-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Current STATE of E-Verify – A brief look at State-Level E-Verify requirements beginning in 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/the-current-state-of-e-verify-a-brief-look-at-state-level-e-verify-requirements-beginning-in-2012/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-current-state-of-e-verify-a-brief-look-at-state-level-e-verify-requirements-beginning-in-2012</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/the-current-state-of-e-verify-a-brief-look-at-state-level-e-verify-requirements-beginning-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 04:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Fay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LawLogix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=2300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slowly but surely, E-Verify is becoming the not-so-voluntary system of choice for verifying new hires’ eligibility to work in the United States. Regardless of whether or not you believe the system is “fast, free, and easy” or “too flawed to be mandatory,” the reality is that many employers are required to use E-Verify through an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/the-current-state-of-e-verify-a-brief-look-at-state-level-e-verify-requirements-beginning-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teaching Hospital Agrees to Pay $115,000 for Discrimination during the I-9 Process</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/antidiscrimination/teaching-hospital-agrees-to-pay-115000-for-discrimination-during-the-i-9-process/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=teaching-hospital-agrees-to-pay-115000-for-discrimination-during-the-i-9-process</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/antidiscrimination/teaching-hospital-agrees-to-pay-115000-for-discrimination-during-the-i-9-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Fay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antidiscrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Document Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=2293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the Department of Justice announced another “6-figure” anti-discrimination settlement agreement – this one with the University of California San Diego Medical Center – to resolve allegations that the hospital failed to comply with proper I-9 procedures for non-citizens who are authorized to work in the United States. As described in my earlier blog post [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/antidiscrimination/teaching-hospital-agrees-to-pay-115000-for-discrimination-during-the-i-9-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

