<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The I-9 and E-Verify Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9</link>
	<description>News and Best Practices from Respected Experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ICE Goes After Three Restaurants with Little Success at OCAHO</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/i-9/ice-goes-after-three-restaurants-with-little-success-at-ocaho/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ice-goes-after-three-restaurants-with-little-success-at-ocaho</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/i-9/ice-goes-after-three-restaurants-with-little-success-at-ocaho/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9 Audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCAHO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalty cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=4478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Editor’s Note: Today’s blog is authored by Bruce E. Buchanan, an Attorney at the Nashville Office of Siskind Susser, P.C.] Although most of the headlines talk about immigration reform, it’s business –as-usual at the Office of Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO), which issued three decisions involving restaurants in March 2013 severely reduced ICE&#8217;s proposed penalties. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/i-9/ice-goes-after-three-restaurants-with-little-success-at-ocaho/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Senate Immigration Bill S.744 – Reasons to Cheer?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/cir/the-senate-immigration-bill-s-744-reasons-to-cheer/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-senate-immigration-bill-s-744-reasons-to-cheer</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/cir/the-senate-immigration-bill-s-744-reasons-to-cheer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 10:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ann Cun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.744]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=4469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the discussions about the Senate’s immigration bill S.744, it’s hard to keep track of substance from chatter.  Last week, the Senate Judiciary Committee began marking up the long bill.  In the meantime, I’ve dug up a few provisions that gives employers reasons to cheer (though not too loudly). Last summer, when the Department [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/cir/the-senate-immigration-bill-s-744-reasons-to-cheer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Form I-9 Basics Every HR Should Know</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/guest-blog/form-i-9-basics-every-hr-should-know/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=form-i-9-basics-every-hr-should-know</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/guest-blog/form-i-9-basics-every-hr-should-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 10:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giselle Carson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guest Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Form I-9]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=4457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Editor’s Note: With the revised Form I-9 required to be used by all employers tomorrow, today's blog is courtesy of Ms. Giselle Carson, Attorney at Marks Gray, P.A. in Jacksonville, Florida.] Immigration reform continues to be at the top of the 2013 agenda for President Obama and the Congress.  Any reform will likely include continuing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/guest-blog/form-i-9-basics-every-hr-should-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitting the Pause Button on E-Verify</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/hitting-the-pause-button-on-e-verify/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hitting-the-pause-button-on-e-verify</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/hitting-the-pause-button-on-e-verify/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ann Cun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeAnne Hilgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.744]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=4450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of February 2013, roughly 429,000 employers are enrolled in E-Verify.  Currently, the (mostly) voluntary E-Verify Program, while growing steadily at over 1,500 enrollments weekly, still struggles to enroll a critical mass of employers given that 2010 Census data indicates there are more than 5.7 million businesses in the U.S. It begs the question, “Why [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/hitting-the-pause-button-on-e-verify/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outdoing Arizona and Alabama: Georgia’s Quest for Immigration Compliance SB 160</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/compliance-measures/outdoing-arizona-and-alabama-georgias-quest-for-immigration-compliance/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=outdoing-arizona-and-alabama-georgias-quest-for-immigration-compliance</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/compliance-measures/outdoing-arizona-and-alabama-georgias-quest-for-immigration-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ann Cun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compliance Measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 160]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=4439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Editor’s Note: Even in the wake of S.744 (the Senate’s Immigration Bill), states are keen on exerting their influence in the immigration compliance debate.  Attorney Charles Kuck, Managing Partner of Kuck Immigration Partners LLC in Atlanta, gives us a taste of the legislative developments in his state in today’s article and explains why SB 160 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/compliance-measures/outdoing-arizona-and-alabama-georgias-quest-for-immigration-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worksite Immigration Compliance Symposium Offers New Debates</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/worksite-immigration-compliance-symposium-offers-new-debates/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=worksite-immigration-compliance-symposium-offers-new-debates</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/worksite-immigration-compliance-symposium-offers-new-debates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ann Cun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.744]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=4435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year’s Third Annual Worksite Immigration Compliance Symposium held at Stanford University’s Law School last Friday, April 19th, was kick started with a keynote speech by House Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-CA).  Indeed, the prospect of immigration reform was never more real than now. For employers though, the recent release and introduction of S.744 immigration bill [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/everify/worksite-immigration-compliance-symposium-offers-new-debates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>G8’s Immigration Bill Shakes Up E-Verify, I-9 and More!</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/announcements/g8s-immigration-bill-shakes-up-e-verify-i-9-and-more/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=g8s-immigration-bill-shakes-up-e-verify-i-9-and-more</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/announcements/g8s-immigration-bill-shakes-up-e-verify-i-9-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 04:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ann Cun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gang of Eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=4425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the early hours of Wednesday morning, the Senate’s “Gang of Eight” Senators released its comprehensive immigration reform bill, all 844 pages of it, entitled the “Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013.” I confess, I didn’t read all 844 pages but I did read enough to bring you the most relevant [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/announcements/g8s-immigration-bill-shakes-up-e-verify-i-9-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Budget and Priorities for DHS FY2014 Affecting I-9 and E-Verify</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/announcements/new-budget-and-priorities-for-dhs-fy2014-affecting-i-9-and-e-verify/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-budget-and-priorities-for-dhs-fy2014-affecting-i-9-and-e-verify</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/announcements/new-budget-and-priorities-for-dhs-fy2014-affecting-i-9-and-e-verify/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ann Cun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FY2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USCIS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=4415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the first quarter firmly behind us, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently released its budget plans for Fiscal Year 2014.  New developments related to E-Verify are in store. The budget for U.S. Citizenship &#38; Immigration Services (USCIS), the agency that oversees the federal E-Verify program, is $3.2 billion dollars, an increase of 5% [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/announcements/new-budget-and-priorities-for-dhs-fy2014-affecting-i-9-and-e-verify/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Register for Stanford Worksite Immigration Compliance Symposium</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/announcements/register-for-stanford-worksite-immigration-compliance-symposium/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=register-for-stanford-worksite-immigration-compliance-symposium</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/announcements/register-for-stanford-worksite-immigration-compliance-symposium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 23:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ann Cun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance Measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford Symposium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=4408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s that time of the year for Stanford’s Annual Worksite Immigration Compliance.  You’ll recall we wrote about the symposium last year here. On Friday, April, 19, 2013, Stanford University’s Rock Center for Corporate Governance will host the Third Annual Worksite Immigration Compliance Symposium all day.  The event is co-sponsored by the Silicon Valley Directors’ Exchange [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/announcements/register-for-stanford-worksite-immigration-compliance-symposium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defining Compliance: More than Just Form I-9 and E-Verify</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/compliance-measures/defining-compliance-i-9-e-verify/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=defining-compliance-i-9-e-verify</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/compliance-measures/defining-compliance-i-9-e-verify/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ann Cun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compliance Measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR Carnival]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/?p=4320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past few years, we’ve been on a mission to define what I-9 and E-Verify compliance looks like.  We’re still on that path….  Today, as part of the Carnival of HR experience, we’re highlighting how others in the HR industry define compliance in their own respective fields. What Does Compliance In Other Fields Look [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlogix.com/electronic-i9/compliance-measures/defining-compliance-i-9-e-verify/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
